From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lea Wiemann Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: use Git.pm, and use its parse_rev method for git_get_head_hash Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:31:51 +0200 Message-ID: <484474D7.6070306@gmail.com> References: <1212188412-20479-1-git-send-email-LeWiemann@gmail.com> <200806020019.23858.jnareb@gmail.com> <20080602092926.GJ18781@machine.or.cz> <200806022332.29853.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org, Lars Hjemli , John Hawley To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 03 00:33:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K3IaT-0002iR-O9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:33:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752490AbYFBWcE (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:32:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755288AbYFBWcC (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:32:02 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:26588 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752726AbYFBWcA (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:32:00 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so857823fgg.17 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:31:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=LAX8uDgnDA5Sjco2BOKuqjvwgK+yPGMoY3HbUhGQHmA=; b=M46IW3TE2mDU/4tmlwi68ajoqpMd/MMx+dA42MRlxmvQbwzeiXhr2u1/3yWZJCzkW7954UgIeJXV1SRPcQ2eLBTGc/FOqDusO21ahDbBVmE/Rw0GlhOEB06QBf+rQxiC2M4Fo6L00MHS935lt6Zp5RPRQAkPci0CyrCFrSC/YQk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=pnYs+o/o9Qpv6Od6slXz6mqbvxIXRHMXH9vDWsbkcX2Z5BdFaIbTRyiSm3tcG206LJJKDW+zJV+J8kUZe66TFpLuHJJxpe+CbOKvbu+cY4CtEwdHfZxA4XgMQ2QRO+Y6cz1G4UIxgFiBskKWZIjLHoC9Xj85FWjpeFSVMwaYaI4= Received: by 10.86.54.4 with SMTP id c4mr4284280fga.33.1212445915434; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.16.30.128? ( [91.33.231.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j12sm11644311fkf.0.2008.06.02.15.31.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:31:54 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) In-Reply-To: <200806022332.29853.jnareb@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski wrote: > Is there some iotop tool, and can it be used to measure performance > bottlenecks of web scripts (web applications)? There is iotop and sysstat's iostat, but the more interesting measure would probably be comparing top's 'wait' vs user+sys CPU time under realistic load ('wait' indicates that the CPU is idling because it is waiting for IO). -- Lea