All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hubert Verstraete <hubskml@free.fr>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RAID5 losing initial synchronization on restart when one disk is spare
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:13:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48466AD9.5@free.fr> (raw)

Hello

According to mdadm's man page:
"When creating a RAID5 array, mdadm will automatically create a degraded
array with an extra spare drive. This is because building the spare
into a degraded array is in general faster than resyncing the parity on
a non-degraded, but not clean, array. This feature can be over-ridden
with the --force option."

Unfortunately, I'm seeing a kind of bug when I create a RAID5 array with 
an internal bitmap, then stop the array before the initial 
synchronization is done and restart the array.

1° When I create the array with an internal bitmap:
mdadm -C /dev/md_d1 -e 1.2 -l 5 -n 4 -b internal -R /dev/sd?
I see the last disk as a spare disk. After the restart of the array, all 
disks are seen active and the array is not continuing the aborted 
synchronization!
Note that I did not use the --assume-clean option.

2° When I create the array without a bitmap:
mdadm -C /dev/md_d1 -e 1.2 -l 5 -n 4 -R /dev/sd?
I see the last disk as a spare disk. After the restart of the array, the 
spare disk is still a spare disk and the array continues the 
synchronization where it had stopped.

In the case 1°, is this a bug or did I miss something?
Secondly, what could be the consequences of this non-performed 
synchronization ?

Kernel version: 2.6.26-rc4
mdadm version: 2.6.2

Thanks,
Hubert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-04 10:13 Hubert Verstraete [this message]
2008-06-10 11:57 ` RAID5 losing initial synchronization on restart when one disk is spare Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-10 22:56   ` Dan Williams
2008-06-11  9:27     ` Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-11 23:40     ` Neil Brown
2008-06-11 14:44   ` Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-11 23:38     ` Neil Brown
2008-06-12 13:05       ` Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-12 16:59         ` Dan Williams
2008-06-12 18:11           ` Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-11 23:45 ` Neil Brown
2008-06-12  8:03   ` David Greaves
2008-06-12 17:01     ` Dan Williams
2008-06-12  9:12   ` Hubert Verstraete

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48466AD9.5@free.fr \
    --to=hubskml@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.