From: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [RFC] dcache scalability patch (2.4.17)
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:50:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48480000.1026514224@w-hlinder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0207121021430.11261-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
--On Friday, July 12, 2002 10:29:53 -0400 Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Maneesh Soni wrote:
>
>> Here is the dcache scalability patch (cleaned up) as disscussed in
>> the previous post to lkml by Dipankar. The patch uses RCU for doing fast
>> dcache lookup. It also does lazy updates to lru list of dentries to
>> avoid doing write operations while doing lookup.
>
> Where is
> * version for 2.5.<current>
> * analysis of benefits in real-world situations for 2.5 version?
>
> Patch adds complexity and unless you can show that it gives significant
> benefits outside of pathological situations, it's not going in.
Here are the slides where I presented, among other things, some
performance results of fastwalk compared to using rcu with lazy
updating of the d_lru list. The results are similar to what Dipankar
just published but there are a few more data points.
http://lse.sf.net/locking
Thanks.
Hanna
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-12 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-12 14:09 [RFC] dcache scalability patch (2.4.17) Maneesh Soni
2002-07-12 14:13 ` [Lse-tech] " Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-12 16:20 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-07-15 8:10 ` Maneesh Soni
2002-07-15 8:25 ` Maneesh Soni
2002-07-12 14:29 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-12 16:10 ` [Lse-tech] " Dipankar Sarma
2002-07-12 18:02 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-07-12 18:10 ` Hanna Linder
2002-07-12 17:35 ` Paul Menage
2002-07-13 8:52 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-13 17:25 ` Paul Menage
2002-07-13 17:33 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-13 17:51 ` Paul Menage
2002-07-13 17:54 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-15 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-12 22:50 ` Hanna Linder [this message]
2002-07-15 7:49 ` Maneesh Soni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48480000.1026514224@w-hlinder \
--to=hannal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.