From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
To: Jakub Jozwicki <jozwicki@aster.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: sched_yield() on 2.6.25
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <484CF1FB.804@aitel.hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806090837.25121.jozwicki@aster.pl>
Jakub Jozwicki wrote:
> From the man sched_yield:
>
> A process can relinquish the processor voluntarily without blocking by
> calling sched_yield(). The process will then be moved to the end of the
> queue for its static priority and a new process gets to run.
>
> and also IEEE/Open Group:
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/sched_yield.html
>
>
>>> pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
>>> th = pthread_self();
>>> if (pthread_equal(th,last_th)) {
>>> pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
>>> sched_yield();
>>> continue;
>>>
>
> Here with SCHED_OTHER sched_yield for the first 100-200 times does nothing.
> Should the man be updated?
>
Having the man page mention the fact that that sched_yield() probably
won't do "what you intend" in the non-realtime cases is probably a
good idea;
that way we get fewer application programmers who mistakenly think
that sched_yield can be used for their purposes. And then we'll have
less broken apps.
A pointer to info about what they might want to use instead is even better.
Helge Hafting
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-09 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.5iKTy3xTJkKWZLGio+GIHXi3+0o@ifi.uio.no>
2008-06-08 22:09 ` sched_yield() on 2.6.25 Robert Hancock
2008-06-09 6:37 ` Jakub Jozwicki
2008-06-09 9:03 ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2008-06-09 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] <aCBfw-3Cv-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aCBfw-3Cv-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aCJd6-3IF-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aCRaM-8cM-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-06-11 15:28 ` Bodo Eggert
2008-06-11 22:45 ` Leon Woestenberg
2008-06-12 8:09 ` Helge Hafting
2008-06-12 22:33 ` Bodo Eggert
2008-06-13 8:37 ` Helge Hafting
2008-06-08 11:34 Jakub W. Jozwicki
2008-06-09 9:35 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=484CF1FB.804@aitel.hist.no \
--to=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=jozwicki@aster.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.