From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] accounting on ct kill Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:22:16 +0200 Message-ID: <484E47C8.5040607@trash.net> References: <1211447601.6878.38.camel@pumper.lan.luxnet.ch> <1211826305.19222.8.camel@pumper.lan.luxnet.ch> <483B93C2.1000905@trash.net> <483C1B9D.5060705@gmx.ch> <483C1F54.6040505@trash.net> <1211928920.14366.12.camel@pumper.lan.luxnet.ch> <483CDA82.8090802@trash.net> <483D1975.3000601@gmx.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Fabian Hugelshofer Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:61165 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751708AbYFJJWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:22:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <483D1975.3000601@gmx.ch> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Fabian Hugelshofer wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: >> Fabian Hugelshofer wrote: >>> Introduces nf_ct_kill_acct() which increments the accounting counters on >>> conntrack kill. The new function was necessary, because there are calls >>> to nf_ct_kill() which don't need accounting: > [...] >> Good points. Applied, thanks Fabian. >> >> I've also pulled in Dave's latest net-next-2.6.git tree and will >> push it out now. > > Thank you as well, Patrick. What about my patch 1 (status field on ct > destroy event)? I didn't see it in you git repository. Should I repost > it with a signed-of-by? Yes, please.