From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1K6ANI-0000rf-Ga for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:23:24 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6ANF-0000kR-CD for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:23:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6AND-0000hc-2z for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:23:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41378 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6ANC-0000h2-Gu for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:23:18 -0400 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:35266 helo=jenni1.rokki.sonera.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6ANA-0000di-SQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:23:17 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (88.193.32.97) by jenni1.rokki.sonera.fi (8.5.014) id 483E82F1009D3E20 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:23:09 +0300 Message-ID: <484EE2AD.5090602@nic.fi> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:23:09 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vesa_J=E4=E4skel=E4inen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <1213128551.1287.17.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1213128551.1287.17.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivemap module X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:23:21 -0000 Javier Mart=EDn wrote: > Since the last posts in the "reimplementing the legacy map command" > thread seemingly died silently, I'm sending the improved version of the > patch here. If the death of the thread was intentional, please just tel= l > me (either nicely or rudely) and I'll be off. I'll answer this now and look at patch when I have better time. Just keep in mind that while we appreciate new feature and bug fixes, we=20 do not have all the time on earth to review them. Please be patient=20 especially if you touch something that can be critical for stability and=20 functionality of the software. We do not want to have feature on the=20 system that no-one knows how it works, so we prefer to have=20 understanding of the feature at hand and then that is gained then it is=20 much easier to comment the patch and then diagnose if it has problems. So please wait a bit, and lets see what kind of comments it gets.