From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: conntrackd causes kernel panic Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:48:34 +0200 Message-ID: <484F7542.8040906@trash.net> References: <200806101343.12607.sabelka@iue.tuwien.ac.at> <200806110841.44410.sabelka@iue.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Krzysztof Oledzki , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Rainer Sabelka Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:62984 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752767AbYFKGsg (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:48:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200806110841.44410.sabelka@iue.tuwien.ac.at> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Rainer Sabelka wrote: > On Tuesday 10 June 2008 20:12:48 Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: >>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Rainer Sabelka wrote: >>>> On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:29, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>>>> Do these two patches help? >>>> Patrick, I tried to apply those patches to the Ubuntu kernel sources >>>> (2.6.24-18) but they failed, so I guess I should try to use a vanilla >>>> kernel >>>> instead. >>>> Which version should I try? >>> Those patches are for nf-next-2.6. I have a backport of this patches for >>> 2.6.24.x and 2.6.25.x kernels, but I need to make sure there were no >>> changes in the latest version. >> OK, here it is (for 2.6.24.7): >> ftp://ftp.ans.pl/pub/patches/patch-ole-2.6.24-o4.gz >> >> Not sure what changes are in ubuntu 2.6.24-18 and probably you may not >> like to take all of my patches so: >> ftp://ftp.ans.pl/pub/patches/broken-out/2.6.24-o4/ >> >> You need patches 0750, 0760, 0840 and 0850. > > Krzysztof, I've applied these 4 patches to ubuntu's 2.6.24-18 and things look > much better now. > "conntrackd -c" no longer causes a kernel panic or oops. Thanks for testing.