From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Alan Piszcz <ap@solarrain.com>
Subject: Re: Linux MD RAID 5 Benchmarks Across (3 to 10) 300 Gigabyte Veliciraptors
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:27:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4850354A.8090503@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0806071015110.23323@p34.internal.lan>
Justin Piszcz wrote:
> First, the original benchmarks with 6-SATA drives with fixed
> formatting, using
> right justification and the same decimal point precision throughout:
> http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20080607/raid-benchmarks-decimal-fix-and-right-justified/disks.html
>
>
> Now for for veliciraptors! Ever wonder what kind of speed is possible
> with
> 3 disk, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10-disk RAID5s? I ran a loop to find out, each run is
> executed three times and the average is taken of all three runs per
> each RAID5 disk set.
>
> In short? The 965 no longer does justice with faster drives, a new
> chipset
> and motherboard are needed. After reading or writing to 4-5 veliciraptors
> it saturates the bus/965 chipset.
This is very interesting, but a 16GB chunk size bears no relationship to
anything I would run in the real world, and I suspect most people are in
the same category.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-11 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-07 14:22 Linux MD RAID 5 Benchmarks Across (3 to 10) 300 Gigabyte Veliciraptors Justin Piszcz
2008-06-07 15:54 ` David Lethe
2008-06-07 15:54 ` David Lethe
2008-06-08 1:46 ` Dan Williams
2008-06-09 7:51 ` thomas62186218
2008-06-09 7:51 ` thomas62186218
2008-06-09 8:43 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-06-09 13:41 ` David Lethe
2008-06-09 13:41 ` David Lethe
2008-06-09 14:27 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-06-09 14:56 ` David Lethe
2008-06-09 14:56 ` David Lethe
2008-06-09 14:56 ` David Lethe
2008-06-09 23:15 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-06-09 23:15 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-06-11 17:02 ` Nat Makarevitch
2008-06-11 20:27 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2008-06-11 20:48 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-06-11 20:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-06-12 19:08 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4850354A.8090503@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=ap@solarrain.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.