From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Zhuravlev <Alex.Zhuravlev@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:05:40 +0400
Subject: [Lustre-devel] COS
In-Reply-To: <C475F666.5B11%peter.braam@sun.com>
References: <C475F666.5B11%peter.braam@sun.com>
Message-ID: <4850A094.60405@sun.com>
List-Id: <lustre-devel-lustre.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org

Peter Braam wrote:
> In a good design, issues like this are traceable.  If they are not, we 
> have found a defect in the design.  Mike, Zam ? how do busy inodes play 
> into use cases and requirements shown in the design document?  To take 
> things one step further, please define a busy inode (and I?m having this 
> feeling that once you define this, you will immediately add a new 
> requirement to the design document).

I think at early stage of VBR *we* decided it's not important with FIDS ...

thanks, Alex