From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Marin Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] remote prune: print the list of pruned branches Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:07:46 +0200 Message-ID: <48510382.9000302@free.fr> References: <1213109413-6842-1-git-send-email-dkr+ml.git@free.fr> <1213109495-6974-1-git-send-email-dkr+ml.git@free.fr> <7v63sf9lye.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Johannes Schindelin , "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 12 13:08:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K6kfJ-00065F-Gx for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:08:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753858AbYFLLHa convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:07:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755374AbYFLLHa (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:07:30 -0400 Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.28]:52773 "EHLO smtp2-g19.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753636AbYFLLHa (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:07:30 -0400 Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048A312B6F1; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:07:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.253.21.40] (hhe95-1-82-225-56-14.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.56.14]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAB212B6E6; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:07:28 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) In-Reply-To: <7v63sf9lye.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano a =E9crit : >=20 > Thanks. I've queued the series (with minor fixups and rewording) to > 'next' already, hoping that we can merge this fix to 'master' before > 1.5.6. Thanks. I find your "would prune/pruned" better. > But I am very tempted to also apply the following on top. Thoughts? Actually, I did that to stay consistent with "git remote update" and, a= s a user, I prefer to see something. That said, I not opposed to your pat= ch. Olivier.