From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Gatliff Subject: Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:19:24 -0500 Message-ID: <48515A9C.7010105@billgatliff.com> References: <1209577322.25560.402.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <200806102235.09598.rob@landley.net> <484F66F8.4020409@snapgear.com> <200806111941.51221.rob@landley.net> <48513F5A.6010008@am.sony.com> <1213285831.26255.152.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080612160845.GB9327@linux-sh.org> <48514E9A.3080901@billgatliff.com> <1213288655.26255.168.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080612170108.GA17231@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080612170108.GA17231@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > There's also the middle way taken by e.g. Scratchbox of using > cross-compilers and other tools from the machine the compilation > is done on, but emulating a native build for the software being > compiled. I suppose. But I've never gotten Scratchbox to work for me, at all. Whether the problem is me or Scratchbox, I don't really want to know. :) b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@billgatliff.com