From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/32on64: fix physical
	addressrestriction
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:46:52 +0100
Message-ID: <4851610C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
References: <48514ECB.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
	<C476F9F8.21FB1%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C476F9F8.21FB1%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> 12.06.08 17:06 >>>
>I tweaked this before checking in as c/s 17836. Please take a look and =
see
>whether it looks okay to you. If so I'll also backport to xen-3.2-testing.=


Looks good - even better, because the calculation is now more correct - I
hadn't realized so far that the old calculation didn't account for the 2M
hole right below 4G.

Jan