From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Courtier-Dutton Subject: Re: What does snd_pcm_delay() actually return? Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:55:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4852D095.1000508@superbug.co.uk> References: <20080609190225.GA4534@tango.0pointer.de> <20080612205225.GB20818@tango.0pointer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.87]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF00244EE for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:55:03 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Takashi Iwai , ALSA development , Lennart Poettering List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > If we remove period tied I/O operations and > assumptions in alsa-lib (thus we will do only byte-stream transfers), then > everything will be fine and possible. > > When will this "byte-stream" architecture be implemented? James