From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: Thoughts on ASOC v2 driver architecture Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:36:19 -0500 Message-ID: <48568873.3040906@freescale.com> References: <9e4733910806151110y13f171dct3948a1555608c0ee@mail.gmail.com> <1213612755.6599.51.camel@odin> <9e4733910806160626h12525bb5ydfb61acd62ef3f09@mail.gmail.com> <4856776B.7040300@freescale.com> <9e4733910806160732h2b1b42f3s1afde73ac8f92026@mail.gmail.com> <20080616150337.GB22229@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3F924359 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:36:25 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20080616150337.GB22229@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jon Smirl , Timur Tabi , ALSA-devel List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Mark Brown wrote: > OOI, I guess that if there were some visible control on the board (eg, a > few controls via GPIO) then this would be less of an issue since there > would be real hardware for the machine/fabric driver to control? Probably not, because the GPIO node in the device tree would be owned by the GPIO driver. I don't think there's a way to have the fabric driver probed from the device tree. It could be probed manually from the arch/powerpc platform driver. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale