From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: NFNETLINK answers: No such file or directory Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:03:48 +0200 Message-ID: <485A6744.9060607@netfilter.org> References: <7b0a40830806181538s40efbd70s66aec17d5c04933@mail.gmail.com> <485A3E81.5070100@netfilter.org> <7b0a40830806190650g6ccacd5br3bc3c9088c73dd2c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: "Adelson O. Junior" Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:52549 "EHLO us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753153AbYFSOEC (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:04:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7b0a40830806190650g6ccacd5br3bc3c9088c73dd2c@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Adelson O. Junior wrote: > Hi, thanks for reply > > I'm using the versions: > > libnfnetlink-0.0.25-1 > libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.50-2 > conntrack-1.0-0.1.beta2 > > We have an application Java based that uses this tools, and uses these versions. > I need to know which of this packets is causing the problem, and which > version is fixing it, before a apply new versions on the Java App. > There are any place thats show the problems fixed in each version? Yes, you can look for the changes on Netfilter's git [1] and the website. However, those versions are from the caveman era and the amount of changes is cumbersome. I strongly recommend you to upgrade. Make sure you use a Linux kernel version >= 2.6.18. -- "Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers