From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.28.152.243] (helo=smtp-relay2.palm.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K9V3C-0003h4-Tr for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:04:27 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,676,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="10245234" Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost02.palm.com) ([148.92.223.90]) by smtp-relay2.palm.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2008 18:03:11 -0700 Received: from flamingo.palm1.palmone.com (flamingo.palm1.palmone.com [148.92.248.64]) by mailhost02.palm.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m5K138XA006357; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <485B01CC.3000701@palm.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:03:08 -0700 From: Rich Pixley User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "openembedded-devel@openembedded.org" References: <48598ECE.9030604@palm.com> <1213862302.5018.2.camel@dax.rpnet.com> In-Reply-To: <1213862302.5018.2.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Subject: Re: bitbake vs incremental builds X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:04:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard Purdie wrote: > It wasn't done for a long time simply because nobody had taken the time > to implement it. It has however recently been implemented, simply set: > > BB_STAMP_POLICY = "full" > or > BB_STAMP_POLICY = "whitelist" > > Whitelist allows you to exempt certain packages from stamp checking, see > packaged-staging.bbclass for an example. This isn't working for me simply by taking a top of tree bitbake and shoving it into my environment. However, my OE environment is over a year old and is moderately hacked locally. I tried to write a trivial test case, but I got bogged down. It's not at all clear to me what one would need to do to use bitbake in some environment other than OE. I was hoping it would be simple to just write an empty conf/bitbake.conf and a couple of a.bb and b.bb files with a depending on b, but 2hrs later I'm still confused. So this isn't working for me and I don't see an easy way to debug it. Any suggestions? --rich