From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daedra Subject: emu20k1 in 1.0.17? Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:35:38 -0700 Message-ID: <485CBD5A.6070305@charter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mta21.charter.net (mta21.charter.net [216.33.127.81]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4681038CD for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:35:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aarprv04.charter.net ([10.20.200.74]) by mta21.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.03.00 201-2186-126-20070710) with ESMTP id <20080621083516.DBJL23078.mta21.charter.net@aarprv04.charter.net> for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:35:16 -0400 Received: from [24.176.218.68] by aarprv04.charter.net with ESMTP id <20080621083516.SFRT4495.aarprv04.charter.net@[24.176.218.68]> for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:35:16 -0400 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org I was just wondering if there is a chance of the emu20k1 driver making it's way into 1.0.17?