From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, enabling ACPI Termal Zone support costs sensors Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:21:04 +0200 Message-ID: <485F32C0.9060401@hhs.nl> References: <485DA11C.7050906@keyaccess.nl> <485DFF35.6080008@hhs.nl> <485E505F.8010306@keyaccess.nl> <485E61DE.6020202@hhs.nl> <485E6F12.4010307@keyaccess.nl> <485E94ED.10602@hhs.nl> <485E992B.8010101@keyaccess.nl> <485ECB23.4010305@keyaccess.nl> <1214185482.3001.45.camel@rzhang-dt.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.versatel.nl ([62.58.50.88]:36110 "EHLO smtp1.versatel.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751424AbYFWFP0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:15:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1214185482.3001.45.camel@rzhang-dt.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Zhang Rui Cc: Rene Herman , "Mark M. Hoffman" , Linux Kernel , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Zhang Rui wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 05:58 +0800, Rene Herman wrote: >> On 22-06-08 20:25, Rene Herman wrote: >> >>> Another way to solve it _could_ be to just make up a device link if >>> something generic is available so that sensors doesn't trip over it >>> in the first place but I don't know if that's a good option. You >>> might. >> This also works for me and, if correct, is ofcourse better than the >> CONFIG option. Wants a comment from the thermal_zone side (for which >> Zhang Rui seems the correct CC?) though. > Hi, Rene and Hans, > > Thank you for your efforts on this issue and sorry for the late > response, I did not check my email during the whole weekend. > > About the hwmon ABI, after the device symbol link is created, are there > any other ABIs required in the device node? Not that I know of, Jean ? Regards, Hans From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:21:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [REGRESSION, ABI] Re: LMSENSORS: 2.6.26-rc, Message-Id: <485F32C0.9060401@hhs.nl> List-Id: References: <485DA11C.7050906@keyaccess.nl> <485DFF35.6080008@hhs.nl> <485E505F.8010306@keyaccess.nl> <485E61DE.6020202@hhs.nl> <485E6F12.4010307@keyaccess.nl> <485E94ED.10602@hhs.nl> <485E992B.8010101@keyaccess.nl> <485ECB23.4010305@keyaccess.nl> <1214185482.3001.45.camel@rzhang-dt.sh.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1214185482.3001.45.camel@rzhang-dt.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Zhang Rui Cc: Rene Herman , "Mark M. Hoffman" , Linux Kernel , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Zhang Rui wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 05:58 +0800, Rene Herman wrote: >> On 22-06-08 20:25, Rene Herman wrote: >> >>> Another way to solve it _could_ be to just make up a device link if >>> something generic is available so that sensors doesn't trip over it >>> in the first place but I don't know if that's a good option. You >>> might. >> This also works for me and, if correct, is ofcourse better than the >> CONFIG option. Wants a comment from the thermal_zone side (for which >> Zhang Rui seems the correct CC?) though. > Hi, Rene and Hans, > > Thank you for your efforts on this issue and sorry for the late > response, I did not check my email during the whole weekend. > > About the hwmon ABI, after the device symbol link is created, are there > any other ABIs required in the device node? Not that I know of, Jean ? Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors