From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: <mingo@elte.hu>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Gregory Haskins" <GHaskins@novell.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, "David Bahi" <DBahi@novell.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:51:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48601AFE.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080623225645.31515.36393.stgit@lsg.lsg.lab.novell.com>
>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:04 PM, in message
<20080623225645.31515.36393.stgit@lsg.lsg.lab.novell.com>, Gregory Haskins
<ghaskins@novell.com> wrote:
>
>
> I think the patch 1/3 is a good one, but it requires careful review. Patch
> 2/3 is based upon some work I had seen PeterZ submit, so its possible to
> just pull his work (if it hasnt been already) as opposed to this patch, if
> desired. Lastly, Patch 3/3 is a bit controversial so I put it last for
> easier cherry picking of the first two. It does help in our testing, but
> it
> will have to be reviewed carefully.
Err...in case it wasnt obvious, I had 2/3 and 3/3 inverted in my description. 2/3 is the controversial one, 3/3 is based on Peter's work. Sorry for the(my) confusion. :)
-Greg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-23 23:04 [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements Gregory Haskins
2008-06-23 23:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock during newidle balancing Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 0:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-24 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock duringnewidle balancing Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lockduringnewidle balancing Gregory Haskins
2008-06-23 23:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: only run newidle if previous task was CFS Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-23 23:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 0:50 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 1:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-24 1:26 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 2:39 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 1:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 2:59 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at leastone " Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once atleastone " Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 19:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 0:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements Steven Rostedt
2008-06-24 1:51 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48601AFE.BA47.005A.0@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=DBahi@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.