From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Frank Myhr <fmyhr@fhmtech.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:52:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] sysfs-interface: pwm [0-100] rather than [0-255] ?
Message-Id: <4860FC02.5030601@fhmtech.com>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <486064B5.5070704@fhmtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <486064B5.5070704@fhmtech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

Jean,

Thank you for your detailed summary of some of the thinking that went
into the current sysfs-interface. Very much appreciated. I can hardly
believe my good fortune in receiving such quick and thoughtful answers
from you. And I apologize for mistakenly crediting you for the [0-255]
choice for pwm range, thanks for setting the record straight.

I don't want to take up any more of your time (right now anyway!).
I accept the [0-255] pwm range as the way it is, and hope that I can
soon contribute automatic pwm control for it87.

Thanks,
Frank

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors