From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [200.234.205.219] (helo=hm633.locaweb.com.br) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KB97T-0004x8-UK for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:03:41 +0200 Received: (qmail 8465 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2008 14:01:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.145) by hm633.locaweb.com.br with QMQP; 24 Jun 2008 14:01:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alain.cosmodata.inet) (am@cosmodata.com.br@201.20.205.130) by hm145.locaweb.com.br with SMTP; 24 Jun 2008 14:01:54 -0000 Message-ID: <4860FE33.5010804@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:01:23 -0300 From: "Alain M." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1213345201.13942.3.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20080624095735.GB3500@aquilonia.hyboria> In-Reply-To: <20080624095735.GB3500@aquilonia.hyboria> Subject: Re: Switching SCM to git and commit/review policy X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:03:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am really new here but I have one suggestion: Graeme Gregory escreveu: >> We've not made any decisions on what the commit/review policy should be, > I have been thinking on this and here is my suggestion. > > 1) OE-core - everything needed to get upto a successful glibc build > completed so gcc, gcc-cross, binutils and support packages. Also most > stuff in classes/. Breakages in these two areas are what hurts the most > and the area we have the least manpower in. I like this > 2) OE-universe - all the other stuff, the recipes and distro configs. > The stuff where breakage tends to be less painful we keep as is. With > people not being afraid to got git-revert on stupid changes. Yes you do > need to test building all users of a .inc file or patch when you change > them. Is it concievable this being divided by packages, or even groups of packages? Somewhat like Linux packages... It would surely make reviews simpler. I have been impressed by the huge size of OpenEmbedded. But I don't really understand it's inner workings enough to know if this is at all possible, but it sounds desirable :) > Anyway thats my 2p. 2p more... Alain