All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:01:15 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4861A6EB.6050806@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080625003751.GP29319@disturbed>

Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:18:09PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> XFS shows 2 build problems today.
>>
>> 1. xfs_stats.h problem
>>
>>   CC      fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o
>> In file included from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:91,
>>                  from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/xfs.h:44,
>>                  from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c:18:
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h: In function 'xfs_init_procfs':
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h:150: error: expected ';' before '}' token
>> make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o] Error 1
> 
> This will be a !CONFIG_PROC_FS change.
> 
> Lachlan/Niv - This is the guilty party:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/xfs-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e0fe783155e4f1c7106f3579c258b9f995330c19
> 
> The commit log is:
> 
> [XFS]
>  
>  SGI-PV: 111111
>  SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31210a
>  
>  Signed-off-by: Niv Sardi <xaiki@sgi.com>
>  Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
> ---
> 
> What the hell happened here? Where's the commit title, description
> so this can be tracked back to a real patch?  That PV# is also bogus....
> 
> I suspect that it is this patch:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00322.html
> 
> Which means that the Signed-Off-By list is incorrect as well as the original
> patch came from Christoph. This can't go to mainline like this - the commit log
> needs to be fixed up.

We knew this checkin was stuffed up and I was planning to fix it in the for-linus
branch before pushing to mainline.  The merge tools had kittens when it came across
it too.  I think we need to rip it out of ptools and re-checkin it in with the
correct details.

> 
>> 2. ACL's undefined
>>
>>   CC      fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.o
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c: In function 'xfs_decode_acl':
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: '_ACL_TYPE_ACCESS' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: for each function it appears in.)
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:42: error: '_ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.o] Error 1
> 
> And this will be a !CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL build, I think.
> 
> Christoph - this is part of your change to use the generic ACL stuff,
> can you have a look?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-25  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-24  7:56 linux-next: Tree for June 24 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-24 11:51 ` [BUG] linux-next: Tree for June 24 - kernel panic at tg3_reset_hw() on x86_64 Kamalesh Babulal
     [not found] ` <20080624175612.cdf29651.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-24 17:53   ` [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 24 - missing files in drivers/media/dvb/ Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-24 17:53     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-25  3:28     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25  3:48       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-29 11:43         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-06-29 12:35           ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25  3:31     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25  0:18 ` linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-25  0:37   ` [xfs-masters] " Dave Chinner
2008-06-25  1:31     ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-06-25  1:52       ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-06-26  8:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-27  7:26         ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25  2:01     ` Lachlan McIlroy [this message]
2008-06-25  3:43       ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-27 13:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-16  7:19       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-17  5:26         ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-07-17  8:28           ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-27 13:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-25  0:24 ` linux-next: Tree for June 24 (ivtv) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-25  6:05   ` Hans Verkuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4861A6EB.6050806@sgi.com \
    --to=lachlan@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.