All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
Cc: Linux-Raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Slowww raid check (raid10, f2)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:13:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4863F85D.7080502@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cccedfc60806261303t4a6d4124w2ab12227d8acb99f@mail.gmail.com>

Jon Nelson wrote:

> MCP55, built-in.
> cat /proc/interrupts:
> 
>            CPU0       CPU1
>   0:      67908  136036611   IO-APIC-edge      timer
>   1:          0         10   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>   2:          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        cascade
>   5:    8325169   15373702   IO-APIC-fasteoi   sata_nv, ehci_hcd:usb1
>   7:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ohci_hcd:usb2
>   8:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc
>   9:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      acpi
>  10:    3722699    7890387   IO-APIC-fasteoi   sata_nv
>  11:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   sata_nv
>  14:    1339948    1448257   IO-APIC-edge      libata
>  15:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      libata
> 4345:   62529065       1494   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
> 4346:          8   60190576   PCI-MSI-edge      eth0
> NMI:          0          0
> LOC:  136110735  136110816
> ERR:          0
> 
>> Do a test of "dd if=/dev/sdb4 of=/dev/null bs=64k" on 1 then 2 and the 3
>> disks while watching "vmstat 1" and see how it scales.
> 
> Start with 1, then 2, then 3. Then back to 2, then back to 1. Then done.
> 
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
>  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa
>  1  1    392   9760 704136  17656    0    0 67968    16 1985 2578  0 24 48 29
>  1  1    392   9384 704632  17636    0    0 74900     0 1704 2540  0 26 45 29
>  2  1    392   9992 703148  18036    0    0 74516     0 1750 2581  0 25 46 29
>  2  0    392   9156 704096  18100    0    0 153856     0 4193 8686  0 55 25 20
>  2  1    392   9240 704328  17892    0    0 147606    32 3990 8608  0 58 20 23
>  3  0    392   9136 704444  17704    0    0 143434    52 3596 8087  0 52 17 30
>  1  2    392   9492 703880  18068    0    0 136604    12 3438 7205  0 50 23 26
>  1  2    392   9552 704272  17588    0    0 153984     0 3837 8461  0 57 21 21
>  1  1    392   9812 704160  17368    0    0 149399     0 3760 8121  0 54 20 26
>  2  1    392   9296 704464  17376    0    0 133546    32 3377 7822  0 52 18 30
>  3  1    392   9240 704040  17796    0    0 152696    16 3811 7704  0 57 16 28
>  3  3    392  10020 703296  17428    0    0 196994    36 5028 6354  0 75  1 23
>  3  0    392   9152 704172  17332    0    0 197809    28 5030 5603  0 74  0 25
>  2  2    392   9232 704440  17324    0    0 203131     0 5141 6030  0 75  0 24
>  3  2    392   9680 704112  16988    0    0 201973     0 5105 5601  1 78  0 22
>  2  1    400  10216 703656  17032    0    8 189088    52 4634 5853  0 69  0 31
>  3  1    400   9112 704664  17004    0    0 188936    44 4721 5495  0 70  2 28
>  1  4    400  10080 704132  17008    0    0 200736     4 5000 6037  0 78  1 21
>  3  2    400   9212 705012  16800    0    0 146072    40 3724 6490  0 54 16 30
>  1  1    400   9724 705988  17328    0    0 108857    32 2707 6034  0 39  9 51
>  1  1    400   9164 706800  17436    0    0 144175     0 3580 8223  0 52 21 26
>  1  2    400  10044 707708  17500    0    0 73452     0 1662 2560  0 26 46 27
> 
> 

That is a good built-in controller then, the scaling is almost perfect, 
predicted would be  74, 158, 222 vs. 74, 154, 205.

                             Roger

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-26 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-26 13:21 Slowww raid check (raid10, f2) Jon Nelson
2008-06-26 14:07 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-06-26 20:03   ` Jon Nelson
2008-06-26 14:24 ` Roger Heflin
2008-06-26 20:03   ` Jon Nelson
2008-06-26 20:13     ` Roger Heflin [this message]
2008-06-26 20:22       ` Jon Nelson
2008-06-26 20:47         ` Roger Heflin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4863F85D.7080502@gmail.com \
    --to=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
    --cc=jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.