From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clark Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the processing of optional options for cyclictest Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:06:43 -0500 Message-ID: <48651013.2070704@gmail.com> References: <520f0cf10806270110l5b3199ablc936c38f4bcf24eb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Leon Woestenberg , John Kacur , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:36751 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757081AbYF0QHO (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:07:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steven Rostedt wrote: > 5B > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I still found it strange that the RTWiki mentions "-t NUM" as if it >> works, so the manual page of cyclictest and the wiki needs a review >> too. > > It doesn't? > > Then again I must have an old version of cyclictest, because both -t5 and > -t 5 work for me. > > -- Steve > You do. The current source in Thomas's git tree exhibits this behavior, because of the way getopt() handles optional arguments. Clark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhlEBMACgkQqA4JVb61b9eXdQCdG2PSWB40Os5VrT/wzttiUgFY 6fwAoIe+jW6q4AjIvmW1YQ8UMZHqFXoY =Hxzp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----