From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: More autofs problems
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:08:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4868B0BA.9040208@aei.mpg.de>
References: <4868946B.7050801@aei.mpg.de>
	<1214815665.3008.11.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1214815665.3008.11.camel@raven.themaw.net>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
To: autofs@linux.kernel.org

Hi Ian,

Ian Kent wrote:
f  4.1.4-13 on amd64.
> 
> I can produce patches for 2.6.24.4 if you would like to test them.
> They are quite recent and haven't been posted for inclusion in any
> kernel yet. I would also include some other patches, that I hope will
> get into mainline, in the series.

I think that would be a good option. I do hope there are not that many
side effects with the other patches, but I definitely would like to get
away from this bug.

Thanks a lot

Carsten