From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] nf_nat_core: eliminate find_appropriate_src call if range is set IP_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM bit on Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:54:05 +0200 Message-ID: <4868D76D.6050008@trash.net> References: <412e6f7f0806292132l18c747d6h982c64ce7c9d9c85@mail.gmail.com> <412e6f7f0806300100t6bc37635pc922405705f1784d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Changli Gao Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:35665 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754477AbYF3MyI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:54:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <412e6f7f0806300100t6bc37635pc922405705f1784d@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Changli Gao wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Changli Gao > Date: 2008/6/30 > Subject: [PATCH] nf_nat_core: eliminate find_appropriate_src call if > range is set IP_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM bit on > To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org > Cc: Changli Gao > > > Eliminate find_appropriate_src call if range is set > IP_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM bit on. Please explain why the call isn't necessary.