From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Aulbert Subject: Re: More autofs problems Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:32:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4868EE71.7070607@aei.mpg.de> References: <4868946B.7050801@aei.mpg.de> <1214815665.3008.11.camel@raven.themaw.net> <4868B0BA.9040208@aei.mpg.de> <1214822142.3008.18.camel@raven.themaw.net> <4868DD3C.5020706@aei.mpg.de> <1214832384.3008.27.camel@raven.themaw.net> <4868EA97.4000103@aei.mpg.de> <1214835616.3008.35.camel@raven.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1214835616.3008.35.camel@raven.themaw.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org To: Ian Kent Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org Ian Kent wrote: > Encouraging the Debian folks to qa version 5 would be probably the best > thing you could do for everyone. It's already in Debian, but only for the next stable version aka lenny: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=autofs5&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all So, I don't know how much effort it would be to backport them to glibc 2.3 instead of 2.7 and so on... Might be worth a try, if you say it's stable enough ;) Cheers Carsten