Re: some filesystem 'benchmarking' with 2.6.26-rc8

[Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>]

Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
[...]
> I plan to do reiser4 with gzip and without compression in the next couple of 
> days. If you want me to try one of the other fs with different options, just 
> say so. 
>   
160000 mails is ~1G, and other 21G is pictures and movies?

If so, then reiser4 with gzip will show the same results.
Reiser4 without mkfs options should be a bit faster (if some
movies were wrongly evaluated as compressible files).

Thanks,
Edward.

> I was very surprised by jfs and xfs. The first was faster than expected (even 
> with the unfairness in its favour) and xfs was much, much slower than 
> expected. XFS was pretty fast with the films, but suffered a lot with the 
> emails, while reiserfs and reiser4 dealt very well with the emails.
>
> Glück Auf,
> Volker
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html