From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] qemu-xen: Fix PV segfault Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:38:32 +0200 Message-ID: <486B3E88.1020904@redhat.com> References: <4863E1F6.60909@suse.de> <18538.27111.959001.890654@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <486B3428.5000006@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <486B3428.5000006@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Kevin Wolf Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Kevin Wolf wrote: > Maybe you're right and it would be better to assign even PV machines a > cpu, but I'm not sure what other functionality this implies to > implement. I'll try to look into this. You can create a dummy cpu in halted state, have a look at http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/patches/0004-xen-groundwork-for-xen-support.patch ;) While I'm at it: There is a patch queue with at http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/patches/ The plan is to submit that stuff upstream, so regular qemu will have xen support. Right now the patch queue has only paravirt bits. It comes with a new machine type and a bunch of backend drivers (console, framebuffer, disk, nic). Will be posted to the list when it is ready for submission (framebuffer still has some problems). cheers, Gerd -- http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/