From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KE7KW-00068m-Te for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:45:24 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KE7KU-00067F-Sq for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:45:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KE7KS-000667-SX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:45:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34011 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KE7KS-00065s-KX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:45:20 -0400 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:44920 helo=kirsi2.rokki.sonera.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KE7KS-0003Qx-6E for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:45:20 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (88.193.32.97) by kirsi2.rokki.sonera.fi (8.5.014) id 4869ED3A0011B495 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:45:19 +0300 Message-ID: <486BCCCE.7000303@nic.fi> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:45:34 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vesa_J=E4=E4skel=E4inen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <486BBFFC.3070907@nic.fi> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: [PATCH] LZMA support in i386-pc kernel X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:45:23 -0000 Bean wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Vesa J=E4=E4skel=E4inen = wrote: >>> properties: lc =3D 3 lp =3D 0 pb =3D 2 >>> memory requirement for the decoder: 15980 bytes >> Can we probe for best values and then use always the best? Perhaps emb= ed >> them as constants to boot code? >=20 > Hi, >=20 > These are the default value of lzma, they are tricky to set, and not > much can be gained by adjusting them anyway. Inside the boot code, I > already use constant for these value, although it can also uses > variable if macro FIXED_PROPS is not defined. >=20 Well... If they are default and you did not pick them by hand. Go with=20 defaults then :)