From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: jdb@comx.dk
Cc: Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patches solving the same issue!?
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:42:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <486CC931.2010703@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1215032251.9467.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> I can see from the list that Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>, and I
> have just posted patches solving the same issue.
>
> I promised Patrick that I would work on this issue, and I did.
Sorry, I'm forgetful sometimes :)
> Its running on our production servers, and I planned to release the
> patch today as it has proven stable on production. I guess Thomas was
> just slightly faster than me ;-)
>
> It was actually already released in the CPAN module IPTables::libiptc
> (ver.0.08 released 2008-06-16).
>
>
> We both use binary search, but with two slightly different approaches.
>
> - My patch uses the existing data structure, and the existing
> algorithm for binary searching.
>
> - Thomas builds a new data structure and implements a new binary
> search algorithm.
>
> I must give Thomas that this binary search algo (taken from wikipedia)
> is much more compact than the existing one.
>
> Guess I cannot judge what patch is the best, as I'm biased...
Me neither since you guys did all the work :)
Please work this out among yourselves. I think we should just pick
the faster one since both don't look very intrusive.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-03 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-02 18:00 [PATCH 0/3] Further speedup of iptables when modifying an existing ruleset Thomas Jacob
2008-07-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] Speed up verdict to chain_head mapping by using binary search Thomas Jacob
2008-07-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] Spelling Thomas Jacob
2008-07-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] Coding style Thomas Jacob
2008-07-02 20:57 ` Patches solving the same issue!? Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2008-07-02 21:47 ` Thomas Jacob
2008-07-02 22:02 ` Thomas Jacob
2008-07-03 10:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2008-07-03 11:17 ` Thomas Jacob
2008-07-03 12:42 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-07-03 14:30 ` Thomas Jacob
2008-07-03 14:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-04 7:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=486CC931.2010703@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jacob@internet24.de \
--cc=jdb@comx.dk \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.