From: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] Fix libdlm static build
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:06:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <486CCEBE.3050809@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807031340490.27368@trider-g7>
Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> the objects included in the static version of dlm are different from the
> one in the shared lib. This is generally wrong as they should be the same.
>
> the patch addresses the problem by killing .po files in favour of more
> common .o and changing the linking targets.
>
> the patch applies to both master and stable2. rhel branches are also
> affected by other problems (_lt is linked to pthread) but i don't think
> it's wise to change it.
>
> Please review and apply.
>
> Thanks
> Fabio
>
> diff --git a/dlm/libdlm/Makefile b/dlm/libdlm/Makefile
> index 0cc1f7b..734eaa9 100644
> --- a/dlm/libdlm/Makefile
> +++ b/dlm/libdlm/Makefile
> @@ -42,26 +42,20 @@ $(TARGET)_lt.a: $(TARGET)_lt.o
> ${AR} cru $@ $^
> ${RANLIB} $@
>
> -$(TARGET).so.${SOMAJOR}.${SOMINOR}: $(TARGET).po $(AISTARGET).po
> +$(TARGET).so.${SOMAJOR}.${SOMINOR}: $(TARGET).o $(AISTARGET).o
> $(CC) -shared -o $@ -Wl,-soname=$(TARGET).so.$(SOMAJOR) $<
> $(PTHREAD_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS)
> ln -sf $(TARGET).so.$(SOMAJOR).$(SOMINOR) $(TARGET).so
> ln -sf $(TARGET).so.$(SOMAJOR).$(SOMINOR) $(TARGET).so.$(SOMAJOR)
>
> -$(TARGET)_lt.so.${SOMAJOR}.${SOMINOR}: $(TARGET)_lt.po
> +$(TARGET)_lt.so.${SOMAJOR}.${SOMINOR}: $(TARGET)_lt.o
> $(CC) -shared -o $@ -Wl,-soname=$(TARGET)_lt.so.$(SOMAJOR) $<
> $(LDFLAGS)
> ln -sf $(TARGET)_lt.so.$(SOMAJOR).$(SOMINOR) $(TARGET)_lt.so
> ln -sf $(TARGET)_lt.so.$(SOMAJOR).$(SOMINOR)
> $(TARGET)_lt.so.$(SOMAJOR)
>
> %_lt.o: $(S)/%.c
> - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
> -
> -%_lt.po: $(S)/%.c
> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -fPIC -c -o $@ $<
>
> %.o: $(S)/%.c
> - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -D_REENTRANT -c -o $@ $<
> -
> -%.po: $(S)/%.c
> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -c -o $@ $<
>
> clean: generalclean
>
I don't understand the problem you are trying to fix here. Having PIC
objects in the dynamic library and non-PIC in the static is perfectly
standard practice.
--
Chrissie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-03 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 11:44 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] Fix libdlm static build Fabio M. Di Nitto
2008-07-03 13:06 ` Christine Caulfield [this message]
2008-07-03 17:49 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2008-07-03 17:53 ` Lon Hohberger
2008-07-04 7:20 ` Christine Caulfield
2008-07-04 7:34 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2008-07-04 8:54 ` Christine Caulfield
2008-07-04 11:28 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=486CCEBE.3050809@redhat.com \
--to=ccaulfie@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.