From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rene Herman Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] wss: use stuct snd_wss instead of snd_ad1848 Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:07:38 +0200 Message-ID: <486D075A.1090409@keyaccess.nl> References: <20080701201411.e7715d83.krzysztof.h1@poczta.fm> <486CACF8.7010607@keyaccess.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.200]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC9B24956 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:06:25 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Alsa-devel , Krzysztof Helt List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 03-07-08 14:46, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:42:00 +0200, > Rene Herman wrote: >> Yes these should probably grow as a series with somewhat of a (semi-) >> final result being apparent after applying patch N of N. I'm importing >> Krzysztof' patches into a "wss" branch in my local git tree and will be >> testing them as they come in though -- and frankly, I think it's better >> if they come in as he does them a few at a time rather than a large >> number at once as it's easier for review purposes. > > Well, I can keep it in a branch if you prefer. Just let me know. If that is to me specifically, I don't really care. "git am" is a very useful tool. >> But as far as I'm concerned you could just sit back until the series is >> somewhat "complete". > > OK. As 2.6.26 will come out soon, it's a bit too late to include > such a big change for 2.6.27. So we have still some time :) If Krzysztof is anything like me, he's not mucking around with ISA stuff due to compatibility with deadlines, so there's even going to be kernels after 2.6.28 I'd say... :-) Rene.