Re: uClibc compatibility or static linking support

[Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>]

Cristi Magherusan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 11:02 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Cristi Magherusan wrote:
>>     
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> As part of my GSoC project I'm working to create a small coreboot
>>> payload containing a KVM-enabled Linux kernel and the KVM tools.
>>>
>>> This involves either compiling and linking KVM against uClibc, or making
>>> a static binary linked against glibc.
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried compiling kvm against uClibc before? I did and it seems
>>> it has some issues. I have fixed some by including aio support inside
>>> uClibc, but it still won't work and I get some linking errors..I can
>>> provide more details if needed.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Please post the build log.
>>     
>
> Sorry, the part about incompatibility with uClibc was an error on my
> side. It were just my build tools.
> I had some errors in the Makefile I'm using for KVM which are now
> partially fixed and now I got rid of that error, but I have another
> strange one which again seems to be caused by my Makefile.
>
> For building all the stuff I'm using a somehow modified version of
> coreboot's buildrom. 
>
> This is my build log:
> http://rafb.net/p/DXMwsg76.html
>   

Okay, try to swap the order of the libraries on the command line, or 
look at the --start-group and --end-group linker options (you may need 
to use the -Wl gcc option with that as well).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function