All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>, "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] tip/x86_64: fix e820 merge issue which broke max_pfn_mapped
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:11:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4874FF58.5030800@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440807091105g1dd8f8a0sa8220a1bfc65a79@mail.gmail.com>

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> try to reduce #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64/32, and make 32/64 at the same page.
>
> could be some regression from early_io_remap unifying from jeremy
>
> please check attached revert patch.

Could my patch "x86_64: there's no need to preallocate 
level1_fixmap_pgt" be a problem in itself?  It seems sound to me, but 
none of my other code has any functional dependency on it; it's really 
just cosmetic.

The unified early_ioremap patch has been kicking around in tip.git for a 
week or more now, and doesn't seem to have caused any problems.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-09 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-08 23:08 [patch] tip/x86_64: fix e820 merge issue which broke max_pfn_mapped Suresh Siddha
2008-07-09  0:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-09  0:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-09  1:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-09 17:56     ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-09 18:05       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-09 18:11         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-07-09 18:44           ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-09 18:47             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-09 18:50               ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-09 18:51                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-09 19:03             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 20:34               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 18:48         ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-09 18:59           ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-09 17:00   ` Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4874FF58.5030800@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.