Hi Philippe,

Philippe Gerum schrieb:
> Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If I call rt_task_bind() with a timeout value other than TM_NONBLOCK or
>> TM_INFINITE
>> it works not as expected (by me).
>>
>> System: Debian Lenny with Xenomai 2.4.3 and Kernel 2.6.24.
>>
>> The attached example calls 3 times rt_task_bind() for a nonexistent task:
>>
>> 1. dont wait: rt_task_bind(&task,"SomeTaskName",TM_NONBLOCK)
>>   -> returns -11 (EWOULDBLOCK) -> OK
>>
>> 2. wait 5 secs: rt_task_bind(&task,"SomeTaskName",5000000000LL);
>>   -> returns immediately -13 (EACCES) without waiting -> ?
>>   -> I expected ETIMEDOUT after 5 seconds
>>
> 
> "SomeTaskName" was found in the registry, but suddenly disappeared while in the
> process of returning its handle (we do post-validation after binding). That task
> has probably exited prematurely.

There was and is no task with this name. This happens on a freshly rebooted box
with any name i choose. Can someone please try my small example from the first
mail on his box. Thank you.

>> 3. wait forever: rt_task_bind(&task,"SomeTaskName",TM_INFINITE);
>>   -> blocks a expected -> OK
>>
>> I have the same problem with rt_queue_bind() calls.
>>
>> Do i expect something wrong?
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>>
>> kisda
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xenomai-help mailing list
>> Xenomai-help@domain.hid
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
> 
>