From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <487E0D43.9080602@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:01:23 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: [RFC] I2C: fsl-i2c: make device probing configurable via FDT References: <487DD1BD.8040701@grandegger.com> <9e4733910807160547q28f49865o11ec878d98987329@mail.gmail.com> <487DF304.7090205@grandegger.com> <9e4733910807160724s136ef980weeeea2488ad7adf2@mail.gmail.com> <20080716143042.GF24045@secretlab.ca> <9e4733910807160742t7037c098k67dcbbadbac992fc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e4733910807160742t7037c098k67dcbbadbac992fc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Jean Delvare , Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jon Smirl wrote: > Probing an i2c bus does not necessarily come to a good conclusion. The > probes for some chips can alter the states in others. People have > accidentally changed voltage settings and fried CPU chips. The process > is not well defined. I agree. We should not be implementing any feature that encourages I2C bus probing. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale