From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <robert.moore@intel.com>, "Andrew Paprocki" <andrew@ishiboo.com>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI WARNING: at drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c:348 acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0x147/0x2f4()
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:14:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <487F29B2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487F0B85.4030202@linux.intel.com>
>The question is just if the hardware is really 8 bits or if the table
>is not just wrong. What does lspci say?
What would lspci have to do with this? /proc/acpi/fadt (from an older
kernel if the new one fails to come up) would seem to help somewhat,
as that would allow comparing the v1 (byte-width) and v2 (bit-width)
values - if they're out of sync (and they likely are if the system worked
flawlessly with previous kernels), I'd be certain the tables are wrong.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 2:29 ACPI WARNING: at drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c:348 acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0x147/0x2f4() Andrew Paprocki
2008-07-17 3:34 ` Andrew Paprocki
2008-07-17 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2008-07-17 9:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 9:14 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2008-07-17 12:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 13:03 ` Andrew Paprocki
2008-07-17 13:58 ` Jan Beulich
2008-07-17 14:32 ` Andrew Paprocki
2008-07-17 15:30 ` Jan Beulich
2008-07-17 17:20 ` ACPI WARNING: at drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c:348acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0x147/0x2f4() Moore, Robert
2008-07-17 17:40 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2008-07-18 8:43 ` Jan Beulich
2008-07-18 16:52 ` ACPI WARNING: atdrivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c:348acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0x147/0x2f4() Moore, Robert
2008-07-18 9:48 ` ACPI WARNING: at drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c:348acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0x147/0x2f4() Jan Beulich
2008-07-17 9:00 ` ACPI WARNING: at drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c:348 acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0x147/0x2f4() Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=487F29B2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew@ishiboo.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.