From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Conntrack Events Performance - Multipart Messages? Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:11:58 +0200 Message-ID: <487FFBEE.90409@trash.net> References: <487E24FC.60700@gmx.ch> <487F18DA.7030208@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fabian Hugelshofer , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:39836 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751925AbYGRCRX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:17:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <487F18DA.7030208@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Fabian Hugelshofer wrote: >> Is someone intending to implement multipart messages for ctevents? ;-) > > The problem here is that batching should be a per-socket parameter. We > will not accept a patch that changes the behaviour for all the ctevent > users. And I don't see an obvious way to do this now Thats a good point, there's no pretty solution to this. Profiles would still be nice to have though :)