All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	menage@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset: fix wrong calculation of relax domain level
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:36:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <488001BF.1070006@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080717152833.1e14a1c4.pj@sgi.com>

Paul Jackson wrote:
> Li Zefan wrote:
>> When multiple cpusets are overlapping in their 'cpus' and hence they
>> form a single sched domain, the largest sched_relax_domain_level among
>> those should be used. But when top_cpuset's sched_load_balance is
>> set, its sched_relax_domain_level is used regardless other sub-cpusets'.
> 
> This code has gotten too complicated for my modest brain ;).
> 
> Question:
> 
>     In the case that the top_cpuset's sched_load_balance is -not- set,
>     is there code already present that sets the sched_relax_domain_level
>     in overlapping cpusets to the largest value in any of the overlapping
>     cpusets?
> 
>     If so, where is that code?
> 

It was your idea to use the largest sched_load_balance for overlapping cpusets.
;)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-18  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-17  8:07 [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset: fix wrong calculation of relax domain level Li Zefan
2008-07-17  8:57 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2008-07-17 10:13   ` Li Zefan
2008-07-17 20:09     ` Paul Jackson
2008-07-17 20:28 ` Paul Jackson
2008-07-18  0:26   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2008-07-18  0:35     ` Paul Jackson
2008-07-18  2:36   ` Li Zefan [this message]
2008-07-18  2:43     ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=488001BF.1070006@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.