From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <mingo@elte.hu>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: readjust the load whenever task_setprio()is invoked
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:01:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48805C06.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216384984.28405.36.camel@twins>
>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:43 AM, in message <1216384984.28405.36.camel@twins>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 15:37 -0600, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> The load may change with the priority, so be sure to recompute its value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
>> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> Right, but in this case we'd need to do the dec/inc load game again
> because otherwise we'll skew stuff - see the previuos mail on how
> dequeue_task() doesn't actually do that.
>
> Also, it looks like current mainline still has this issue.
>
> OTOH - since prio boosting is a temporal feature, not changing the load
> isn't too bad, we ought to get back to where we came from pretty
> quickly.
Yeah, I agree. This issue probably didn't actually matter much in practice.
It just "looked" wrong, so I figured I'd fix it ;)
-Greg
>
>
>
>> ---
>>
>> kernel/sched.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
>> index b046754..c3f41b9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
>> @@ -4637,6 +4637,7 @@ void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
>> p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
>>
>> p->prio = prio;
>> + set_load_weight(p);
>>
>> // trace_special_pid(p->pid, __PRIO(oldprio), PRIO(p));
>> prev_resched = _need_resched();
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 21:37 [PATCH 0/2] sched: misc fixes for stable-25.y and 25-rt Gregory Haskins
2008-07-03 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: remove extraneous load manipulations Gregory Haskins
2008-07-18 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 12:53 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-21 22:06 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-03 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: readjust the load whenever task_setprio() is invoked Gregory Haskins
2008-07-18 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 13:01 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48805C06.BA47.005A.0@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.