From: oliver@neukum.org (Oliver Neukum)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] USB: HCD/EHCI: giveback of URB in tasklet context
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:51:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4881808.FBe1KpJCmT@linux-5eaq.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVMxAddaHdjfi2rOOEW46-XA3KozULjFtLvEpo-MZC7+Aw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 17:27:28 Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 June 2013 16:14:25 Ming Lei wrote:
> > The driver itself may have submitted a timer and race against it.
> > What locking do you need in complete() and a timer to lock against
> > each other?
>
> Good catch.
>
> The problem will come if only spin_lock() is called inside complete(),
> I will check main USB drivers in tree to see if there is such use case.
All network drivers race against timeout. I think they just unlink the URB,
but there's a lot of them.
> > But it makes no sense to go to a tasklet when you are already in task context.
> > In those cases you need to do something, essentially blocking the tasklet.
>
> At least now, always doing complete() in tasklet handler can simplify
> implementation since these cases aren't in hot path.
Well, I am afraid this is not simply the case. These cases are partially
synchronous. For example you need to make sure all calls to complete()
are finished before you disconnect a HCD itself. The same applies to a device
being disconnected.
It the same area, what happens if an URB is unlinked between the irq handler
and the tasklet?
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-09 15:18 [RFC PATCH 0/4] USB: HCD/EHCI: giveback of URB in tasklet context Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] USB: HCD: support " Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:58 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 8:12 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 8:43 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-10 9:23 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 9:31 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-10 9:51 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] USB: EHCI: don't release ehci->lock if URB giveback " Ming Lei
2013-06-09 16:06 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 9:10 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] USB: EHCI: improve interrupt qh unlink Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] USB: EHCI: support running URB giveback in tasklet context Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] USB: HCD/EHCI: giveback of URB " Alan Stern
2013-06-10 6:05 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 14:03 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 14:12 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-10 15:33 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 15:37 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 17:36 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-10 20:47 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-11 8:40 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 20:51 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-11 6:19 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 5:40 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 7:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-11 8:14 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 8:49 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-11 9:27 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 10:51 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2013-06-11 11:19 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 19:10 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-12 2:43 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-12 6:41 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-12 7:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-13 2:25 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-13 14:54 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-13 18:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-13 19:41 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-13 20:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-13 21:09 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-13 22:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-13 23:08 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-14 1:27 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 0:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-14 1:53 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 6:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-14 10:05 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 1:37 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 3:24 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 14:56 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-14 15:15 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 20:23 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-14 21:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-15 1:49 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 2:03 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-12 14:35 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-12 15:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-13 3:41 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-13 15:05 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-12 9:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-12 10:11 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-12 10:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-12 11:33 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4881808.FBe1KpJCmT@linux-5eaq.site \
--to=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.