From: Isaac Dupree <id@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: menu loop (patch)
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:45:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48827C91.8070807@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080719233155.GA16216@pina.cat>
Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul/19/2008, Isaac Dupree wrote:
>> Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
>>> fast check in KDE: it's looping
>>>
>>> Also, Iceweasel menus are looping here (maybe because it's executed
>>> in KDE and there is some GTK Widget with a different behaviour? I have
>>> no idea)
>> GTK menubar-menus are looping for me. But I'm not sure about menus that
>> consist of selecting from a list in a box (maybe some login window?). I
>> don't care personally, because my GRUB-lists are not terribly long...
>> hmm, if you hold down a (arrow) key in GRUB, is there auto-repeat?
>
> no, there isn't auto-repeat (this is what the patch that we are talking
> does).
>
> GRUB-lists shouldn't be terrible long, but quite users needs to go from
> the first option to the last option quite often (at least is what i
> see).
is this because tools tend to add options to the *end* of the list --
the same way my browser adds bookmarks to the end of the bookmarks menu?
That's the situation I find myself really using looping regularly in
my OS (Firefox, Linux).
It might be worth the effort to add a config option, if there are people
who have to deal with their boot-menu on a regular basis (are there?
probably...). Then if they're like me, they'll want to be able to fix
its annoying behavior for the future. So it's worth it for them; and if
there are a significant number of people like that, the one-time cost of
*implementing* the option may be worth it.
-Isaac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-19 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 21:22 menu loop (patch) Carles Pina i Estany
2008-07-19 15:40 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-19 17:21 ` Carles Pina i Estany
2008-07-19 19:52 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-19 22:12 ` Carles Pina i Estany
2008-07-19 23:26 ` Isaac Dupree
2008-07-19 23:31 ` Carles Pina i Estany
2008-07-19 23:45 ` Isaac Dupree [this message]
2008-07-20 4:24 ` Colin D Bennett
2008-07-19 17:34 ` Colin D Bennett
2008-07-19 19:58 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-19 20:31 ` Yoshinori K. Okuji
2008-07-19 22:06 ` Carles Pina i Estany
2008-07-19 22:15 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-19 22:28 ` Colin D Bennett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-20 6:21 chaac
2008-07-20 8:49 ` Carles Pina i Estany
2008-07-22 21:40 ` Robert Millan
2008-08-05 7:15 ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48827C91.8070807@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org \
--to=id@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.