From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: git pull versus fetch/merge
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:11:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488452D6.1060508@keyaccess.nl> (raw)
Good day.
A while ago I was here asking about "git pull" versus "git merge" for
local branches -- now I see a difference for remote ones that I'm not
sure should be there.
I gathered before that "git pull <remote> <branch>" should basically be
shorthand for "git fetch <remote>, git merge <remote>/<branch>". Is that
correct?
I'm seeing a problem I believe with a specific repository:
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git remote show tiwai
* remote tiwai
URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6
Tracked remote branches
devel dma-fix for-linus master upstream
with "git pull tiwai devel" everything goes well:
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git status
# On branch master
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git branch tmp0 v2.6.26
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git branch tmp1 v2.6.26
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git checkout tmp0
Switched to branch "tmp0"
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git pull tiwai devel
Updating bce7f79..e0bf09b
Fast forward
Documentation/sound/alsa/ALSA-Configuration.txt | 17 +-
[ ... ]
and I get a clean merge. On the other hand, if I try to do this with a
fetch/merge, I get:
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git checkout tmp1
Switched to branch "tmp1"
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git fetch tiwai
From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6
! [rejected] devel -> tiwai/devel (non fast forward)
! [rejected] dma-fix -> tiwai/dma-fix (non fast forward)
! [rejected] master -> tiwai/master (non fast forward)
rene@7ixe4:~/src/linux/7ixe4$ git merge tiwai/devel
Auto-merged sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c
Auto-merged sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
Auto-merged sound/pci/hda/patch_analog.c
Auto-merged sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
Auto-merged sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
and me no happy...
It probably has something to do with that " ! [rejected]" but what is
that about? Is the repo bad? (and if so, I suspect owner will want to
know how to avoid it in the future).
And if it is bad, should I be seeing something with the pull method
also? Moreover... can I now trust my tmp0 branch?
Rene.
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-21 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-21 9:11 Rene Herman [this message]
2008-07-21 10:23 ` git pull versus fetch/merge Björn Steinbrink
2008-07-21 10:58 ` Rene Herman
2008-07-21 11:09 ` Jeff King
2008-07-21 11:09 ` Jeff King
2008-07-21 11:30 ` Rene Herman
2008-07-21 11:33 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-07-21 11:39 ` Rene Herman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488452D6.1060508@keyaccess.nl \
--to=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.