From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Fabian Hugelshofer <hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Conntrack Events Performance - Multipart Messages?
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:07:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4887656B.1090504@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <488763F3.5020506@trash.net>
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
>> Is the zeroing of the inverted tuple in nf_ct_invert_tuple really
>> required? As far as I can see all fields are set by the subsequent code.
>
> It dependfs on the protocol family. For IPv6 its completely
> unnecessary, for IPv4 the last 12 bytes of each address need
> to be zeroes. We could push this down to the protocols to
> behave more optimally (actually something I started and didn't
> finish some time ago).
Actually that really is necessary because we have padding in the
tuple on at least ARM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-23 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-16 16:42 Conntrack Events Performance - Multipart Messages? Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-17 9:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-17 10:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-17 14:34 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-17 15:15 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-18 15:56 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-18 2:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-21 15:51 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-21 15:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-21 17:49 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-23 14:32 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-23 14:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-23 16:12 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-23 17:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-23 17:07 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-07-23 17:30 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-23 17:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-23 17:38 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-23 17:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-23 17:15 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-23 17:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-24 13:21 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-25 8:51 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-25 9:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-25 11:15 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-27 17:23 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-28 18:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-28 23:12 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-29 17:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-25 8:44 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4887656B.1090504@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.