From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.109.24.25] (helo=smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KM17n-0002ZZ-Fx for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:44:55 +0200 Received: from surfplank2.hierzo (pindarots.xs4all.nl [80.101.128.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6ODhcIq008882 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:43:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from udovdh@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <48888709.40906@xs4all.nl> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:43:37 +0200 From: Udo van den Heuvel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org References: <200807240048.20980.bluelightning@bluelightning.org> <1404.78.86.188.127.1216886903.squirrel@webmail12.pair.com> <1216890490.6103.1.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <48887DC7.3030603@xs4all.nl> <1216905807.6103.32.camel@dax.rpnet.com> In-Reply-To: <1216905807.6103.32.camel@dax.rpnet.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=8300CC02 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: PATCH: make h2200-bootloader load & depend on mtdblock X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:44:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 15:04 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: >> Richard Purdie wrote: >>> Yes, its standard practise to RRECOMMEND kernel modules since if they're >>> built into the kernel you get build failures otherwise. The RRECOMMEND >>> is a standard approach and well tested. >> Apart from this discussion, sorry to interrupt, but does mtdchar >> 9related to mtdblock I guess) actually work? >> On my H2200('s) it fails to properly flash a kernel. >> It doesn't matter much now because we boot from SD, but nevertheless it >> is strange. >> The mtd folks refuse to help me when I repeatedly queried them. > > Yes, mtdchar usually works. 'usually' sounds atypical here: http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4354 but also: http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4324 and: http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4362 So a whole slew of flash-related issues, all based on mtd-related code. My ipaq ran win2003 mobile fine. > It may not do exactly what you expect though That is what I observe, others see similar issues. Udo