From: "Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Memory allocation in NUMA system
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:34:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488949B3.7080205@intel.com> (raw)
Currently, when alloc_domheap_pages() is called with no range specified
(which is the case for allocating domain memory during its creation), it
uses such priority to allocate memory:
1) current node, > DMA range (2^dma_bitsize = 4G).
2) other nodes, > DMA range
3) current node, all range
4) other nodes, all range
Let's say we have a 2-node system, with node0 and node1's memory range
being 0-0xc0000000 (<4G) and 0x100000000-0x1c0000000 (>4G) respectively.
In that case, node1's memory is always preferred for domain memory
allocation, no matter which node the created domain is pinned to. It
results in performance penalty.
One possible fix is to specify all range for the domain memory
allocation, which means local memory is preferred. This change may be
restricted only to the domain pinned to one node for less impact.
One side effect is that the DMA memory size may be smaller, which makes
device domain unhappy. This can be addressed by reserving node0 to be
used lastly.
Comments?
Thanks,
Xiaowei
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 3:34 Yang, Xiaowei [this message]
2008-07-25 6:53 ` Memory allocation in NUMA system Keir Fraser
2008-07-25 7:22 ` Yang, Xiaowei
2008-07-25 7:27 ` Keir Fraser
2008-07-25 7:51 ` Yang, Xiaowei
2008-07-25 7:55 ` Keir Fraser
2008-07-25 10:26 ` Yang, Xiaowei
2008-07-25 12:56 ` Keir Fraser
2008-07-28 12:21 ` Andre Przywara
2008-07-28 12:38 ` Keir Fraser
2008-07-28 14:26 ` Andre Przywara
2008-07-28 14:53 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488949B3.7080205@intel.com \
--to=xiaowei.yang@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.