From: Alex Zhuravlev <Alex.Zhuravlev@Sun.COM>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] statahead feature
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:17:04 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488961D0.9060709@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37e3b1470807242204x6ab9037bif384e8a37595b6c6@mail.gmail.com>
Ragnar Kj?rstad wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Alex Zhuravlev <Alex.Zhuravlev@sun.com> wrote:
>> no, I don't think we need lock always: you just did getattr and fill inode
>> with fresh attributes, then you release lock, somebody changes attributes
>> on the server and only then userspace application gets attributes (already
>> non-fresh). so, what lock gives you in this case?
>
> If I have an application that does:
> 1. Update stat data on one node.
> 2. Barrier
> 3. Read the same stat data on a different node
>
> I should be guaranteed to get the correct data, right?
> So stat should return data that was valid either when the system call
> started, when it ended, or somewhere in between. (not data that was
> invalid even before the systemcall started)
indeed. we can't use this trick in all the cases. I think it's a subject
of discussion what we consider a barrier, for regular stat(2) it can be
start of system call. for ls -l case it can be open(2). isn't this a
reasonable cost for significant performance improvement of ls -l ?
my understanding is that for NFS with readdir+ support, the barrier will
be open(2).
thanks for this good point, Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-24 10:19 [Lustre-devel] statahead feature Alex Zhuravlev
2008-07-24 11:35 ` Alex Lyashkov
2008-07-24 16:27 ` Peter Braam
2008-07-24 18:56 ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-07-25 4:34 ` Yong Fan
2008-07-25 4:41 ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-07-25 5:04 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2008-07-25 5:17 ` Alex Zhuravlev [this message]
2008-07-28 22:02 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-25 9:37 ` Alex Lyashkov
2008-07-25 12:29 ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-07-25 19:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-25 19:50 ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-07-25 4:44 ` Alex Zhuravlev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488961D0.9060709@sun.com \
--to=alex.zhuravlev@sun.com \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.