From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KMgPU-0001n9-OO for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:49:56 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2008 09:48:31 -0000 Received: from BAA0a9b.baa.pppool.de (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [77.128.10.155] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2008 11:48:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2218979 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19c7oBQ2m5cGp4mly5BlSlyg48GMU0EuTuNrzeTp9 fEyRf2qmj0Aemp Message-ID: <488AF2ED.2030709@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:48:29 +0200 From: Thomas Kunze User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4889169C.7040108@gmx.de> <1217065082.22069.111.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> In-Reply-To: <1217065082.22069.111.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.67 Subject: Re: RFC: kernel.bbclass and collie changes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:49:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 01:56 +0200, Thomas Kunze wrote: > >> +/dev/mmcblk0p1 b 6600 0 6 179 1 - - - >> > > Is that "6600" really correct? > Of course not. Just a typo. > It does also seem bit odd having an mmc device in the "minimal" device > table. I can understand why you need it on collie but I am not sure it > is all that desirable for device-table-minimal.txt to become the union > of the devices that everybody needs on their favourite platform for > booting purposes. Since this is truly a machine specific thing I would > be inclined to use a separate file, or a collie-specific catenation onto > the installed copy. > I see your point. But OTOH we have 20 hda*, 9 serial consoles and 16 mtd nodes in there. So its hardly minimal. In my opinion it doesn't hurt to add a further node.