From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:43:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488E053A.40205@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8328f7c0807281035rc9f6b69l3ab88980d0f6db5e@mail.gmail.com>
Ben Warren wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
>> I find a device tree much easier to figure out than a tangled mess of header
>> files, #defines, and #ifdefs...
>
> In many ways, yes. But are you an average Joe or a Linux kernel propellerhead?
Is u-boot work normally done by average Joes, and does the average Joe
really find the preprocessor mess more intuitive than a "propellerhead"?
While we're at it, let's re-write u-boot in Visual Basic. :-)
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-28 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 15:07 [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config Kumar Gala
2008-07-28 17:28 ` Ben Warren
2008-07-28 17:32 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-28 17:35 ` Ben Warren
2008-07-28 17:43 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2008-07-28 18:05 ` Ben Warren
2008-07-28 18:59 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-29 8:26 ` André Schwarz
2008-07-29 8:41 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-29 9:09 ` André Schwarz
2008-08-03 1:10 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-07-29 16:41 ` Timur Tabi
2008-07-28 17:40 ` Grant Likely
2008-07-28 18:17 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-28 19:07 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-29 7:54 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-07-28 18:13 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-28 18:19 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-29 14:30 ` Jon Loeliger
2008-07-29 15:51 ` Robert Schwebel
2008-07-29 15:51 ` Robert Schwebel
2008-07-29 16:46 ` Timur Tabi
2008-08-03 1:58 ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-03 7:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-03 12:57 ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-03 15:47 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-03 17:49 ` Timur Tabi
2008-08-03 19:06 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-03 20:08 ` Timur Tabi
2008-08-04 8:08 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2008-08-04 7:16 ` Jens Gehrlein
2008-08-03 19:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-04 14:33 ` Timur Tabi
2008-08-04 15:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-04 15:36 ` Timur Tabi
2008-08-03 20:47 ` Andrew Dyer
2008-08-04 15:02 ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-04 15:05 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488E053A.40205@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.